[IAEP] [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #2: making easier for people to title their activities
simon at schampijer.de
Sun Jan 18 10:51:45 EST 2009
Walter Bender wrote:
> Looks good. I am hoping that the description field will start to see
> more use, as I leverage it directly ion the Portfolio tool.
pushed to git now.
> comment: I don't see the option to not save the entry.
Tomeu and myself decided that the 'don't keep' button does not make
sense in the dialog. The argument was, that the entry is saved already.
And don't keep would mean that the entry needed to be erased. With the
added 'resume by default', we don't have the proliferation of useless
entries we used to have.
Happy to keep on arguig about it.
> comment: maybe we should have a feature where by tags are also
> suggested, either by the activity or by tags previously assigned.
Yeah, those tags could be generated based on content. In write or browse
this looks like a quite logic thing to do.
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Simon Schampijer <simon at schampijer.de> wrote:
>> Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> yesterday we entered in feature freeze, meaning that no new features
>>> can be committed without prior discussion in the community.
>>> The journal's search and browsing capabilities are less useful if all
>>> entries are named the same regardless of their actual content or
>>> meaning to the user.
>>> That's why has been proposed to make easier to the users to title and
>>> tag their entries by showing a dialog when they close their activity
>>> for the first time.
>>> We have now a quite crude implementation in, but is quite
>>> disconcerting to users because it's not very clear why is that
>>> appearing now.
>>> Simon is working on several enhancements that will make it clearer
>>> (Simon, can you paste a link to a screenshot?).
>> http://dev.sugarlabs.org/ticket/215 contains patch and screenshot.
>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>> IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
More information about the IAEP