[IAEP] [Sugar-devel] How to Make Activity Designers Happy , Parts I and II
wadetb at gmail.com
Fri Jan 2 15:49:28 EST 2009
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Bryan Berry <bryan at olenepal.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 15:18 -0500, Walter Bender wrote:
> > (3) We need lots more Activities.
> While there is consensus on this point, there is not consensus on the
> best way to get a lot more Activities. That is, pulling a lot more
> developers into building learning activities that run on Sugar.
There is a related point regarding Sugar idealism. Sugar was designed with
a very specific notion of what an activity: collaborative, constructivist,
stores in the Journal, view source, written in PyGTK using the supplied
Sugar is linked to this initial choice.
More recently, a consensus seems to have developed that it is worthwhile to
include less "ideal" activities, in the name of having those activities at
I think it is worth recognizing this change so as to encourage related
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the IAEP