Benjamin M. Schwartz
bmschwar at fas.harvard.edu
Fri Feb 27 11:56:52 EST 2009
David Farning wrote:
> Sorry there was a typo in my last email the site is actually
I forcefully object to everything about this website. It is ugly,
off-putting, unnavigable, unreadable, buggy, empty of any helpful
information, and in many other ways among the worst websites I could
demo, which is not at all useful here.
Meanwhile, the front page of the wiki is beautiful. It presents the
visitor immediately with a statement explaining what Sugar is, and a bunch
of clearly named links to learn more about Sugar and Sugar Labs.
Scrolling down presents a wealth of introductory information about Sugar,
presented in a logical fashion. It does all of this in a
non-headache-inducing color scheme, using complete sentences. Clearly a
lot of work has been put into this, and it shows.
Unless someone wants to come up with a decent webpage (must be better than
laptop.org!), let's just stick to the wiki.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/attachments/20090227/89cb23e9/attachment.pgp
More information about the IAEP