[IAEP] [Sugar-devel] activites known not to either work at all or not on certin platforms
dr at jones.dk
Wed Feb 11 10:49:29 EST 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 03:57:05PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>On 11.02.2009, at 10:59, Morgan Collett wrote:
>> This is packaged, but I think we're still missing a bit - the actual
>> sugar activity for etoys. I don't personally have the time to work on
>> it because I'm working on the above (and the actual glucose
>What needs to be done there? Can anybody else package this?
Yes, anyone with some interest in .deb packaging can help.
Debian POV: Someone needs to volunteer packaging "sugar-etoys-activity".
Drop an email to debian-olpc-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org .
Ubuntu POV: Someone needs to volunteer hacking together a sugar
activity package until a Debian package can be adopted. More info at
I recommend helping as "upstream" as possible instead of only locally
for Ubuntu. YMMV.
 I do not mean to say that Ubuntu packaging in principle is any worse
quality than packages adopted from Debian. Just that Ubuntu generally
seems to generally favor passing on the grunt work to Debian and treat
locally packaged stuff as temporary, i.e. hacks.
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the IAEP