[IAEP] [Sugar-devel] activites known not to either work at all or not on certin platforms

[Jonas Smedegaard]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 03:57:05PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>On 11.02.2009, at 10:59, Morgan Collett wrote:
>>
>>> etoys
>>
>> This is packaged, but I think we're still missing a bit - the actual 
>> sugar activity for etoys. I don't personally have the time to work on 
>> it because I'm working on the above (and the actual glucose 
>> packages).
>
>
>What needs to be done there? Can anybody else package this?

Yes, anyone with some interest in .deb packaging can help.

Debian POV: Someone needs to volunteer packaging "sugar-etoys-activity". 
Drop an email to debian-olpc-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org .


Ubuntu POV: Someone needs to volunteer hacking[1] together a sugar 
activity package until a Debian package can be adopted. More info at 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SugarTeam


I recommend helping as "upstream" as possible instead of only locally 
for Ubuntu. YMMV.


  - Jonas


[1] I do not mean to say that Ubuntu packaging in principle is any worse 
quality than packages adopted from Debian. Just that Ubuntu generally 
seems to generally favor passing on the grunt work to Debian and treat 
locally packaged stuff as temporary, i.e. hacks.

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkmS84kACgkQn7DbMsAkQLjj7gCeOHNkXx0yX1vSnJx7NDnN36YY
4RgAn3lJ+8ypu6NpxWPU0fiUodTIXuvS
=y5x6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----