[IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Future of Zero Sugar

Tomeu Vizoso tomeu at sugarlabs.org
Tue Dec 15 09:23:06 EST 2009


On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:19, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
> On 15.12.2009, at 15:09, Daniel Drake wrote:
>>
>> I believe there are still various well-known 0.86 regressions (over
>> 0.84). For example, Record not working. These regressions are going to
>> be a huge headache to anyone who tries to upgrade, perhaps you could
>> squash a few of those.
>
> Speaking of upgrade headaches, the most significant UI change in 0.84 is resume-by-default, which combined with the still not implemented versioning is possibly unhealthy in deployments. I can see many Journal entries overwritten for good. Has there been any experience with kids used to the 0.82 way who switched to a later Sugar version? And if needed, would it be easy for deployments to revert to not resuming by default?

Good point, reverting would be easy and also adding a setting to
switch it on or off. I can work on it if someone takes the task of
verifying the need.

Regards,

Tomeu


-- 
«Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar.
What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David
Farning


More information about the IAEP mailing list