[IAEP] deployment feedback (was Re: [Sugar-devel] GPA ain't the world (was: [Sugar-news] Sugar Digest 2009-08-11))

Tomeu Vizoso tomeu at sugarlabs.org
Mon Aug 17 11:45:44 EDT 2009

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 17:32, Walter Bender<walter.bender at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Christoph
> Derndorfer<e0425826 at student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
>> Tomeu Vizoso schrieb:
>>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 03:39, Raul Gutierrez Segales<rgs at rieder.net.py> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 15:06 -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:17 PM, David Van Assche<dvanassche at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>> Or are you saying the feedback is getting through and I'm just not seeing
>>>>>> it?
>>>>> We all seem to agree that feedback is important.
>>>>> We mostly agree that there is value in feedback from all deployments,
>>>>> big and small.
>>>>> We are currently getting valuable feedback from the field: Sur, the
>>>>> Ceibal blogs, reports from Nepal, Greg's reports from GPA, et al.
>>>>> We need more feedback and therefore we are exploring additional means
>>>>> of getting it. You ideas are welcome!
>>>> Perhaps a section in Sugar Digest with links to highlights of what went
>>>> on in deployments during the week?
>>> Sounds like a great idea to me.
>> Yes, this is indeed a great idea!
> In order to implement this idea, I need feedback from the field (Catch-22?)

I think Nepal and Paraguay would be willing to provide weekly news?
Any Boston pilots? Hernan for Peru? Maybe Oceania?

If we start with the ones that are already participating in the
community, may be easier to get th eothers to jump in.



«Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar.
What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David

More information about the IAEP mailing list