[IAEP] [Bugs] #1117 NORM: Image collection from Museum of Fine Arts in Boston
David Farning
dfarning at sugarlabs.org
Sat Aug 1 17:45:52 EDT 2009
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Aleksey Lim<alsroot at member.fsf.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 12:58:09PM +0000, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 12:33:22PM -0000, SugarLabs Bugs wrote:
>> > #1117: Image collection from Museum of Fine Arts in Boston
>> > ----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
>> > Reporter: walter | Owner: tomeu
>> > Type: enhancement | Status: new
>> > Priority: Normal | Milestone: Unspecified by Release Team
>> > Component: sugar | Version: Unspecified
>> > Severity: Unspecified | Keywords:
>> > Distribution: Unspecified | Status_field: Unconfirmed
>> > ----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
>> > If anyone is interested in taking it on, I have permission from the Museum
>> > of Fine Arts in Boston to distribute 100 pictures from their collection
>> > --kid-oriented images. We never finished packaging them while I was at
>> > OLPC, but it would make a nice content bundle to include.
>> >
>> > I will need to review the final packaging details with the Museum, but I
>> > suspect that they will be more than willing to let us distribute them as
>> > part of Sugar, not just part of OLPC.
>>
>> I guess we should speed up process of creating library.sugarlabs.org in
>> that case.
>>
>> I see two points here:
>> * merge(in some form) Objects Bundles [1] to last sugar and backport it
>> to 0.84(0.82?)
>
> ..and of course we can use .xol bundles that should work on all sugars
>
>> * choosing the way to deploy these Object Bundles [2]
>>
>> In case of [1], in email thread[3] there are suggestions to utilize
>> existed(non-sugar) data formats to packages Objects Bundles, I think
>> we can start from simple(and already utilized in sugar) INI .info
>> format. Later(even in 0.86 release cycle), after getting feedback of
>> using library.sugarlabs.org we can switch to something different.
>>
>> In case of [2], I've heard about two(?) options:
>> * Moodle on XS
>> * Mozilla framework which already using for ASLO
OLE Nepal has been working on a a content management system called
pustakalaya at http://www.pustakalaya.org/ At first glance it shows
great promise. It scales from small enough to run on a school server
to large enough to serve an entire country. It is based on fedora
commons, which is pretty stable. On the other hand, it does not have
the upload content features that moodle or ASLO have.
david
>> [1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Object_Bundles
>> [2] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Server_Objects_Sharing
>> [3] http://www.mail-archive.com/sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org/msg06874.html
>>
>> --
>> Aleksey
>
More information about the IAEP
mailing list