[IAEP] [Marketing] ASLO vs. Activities Portal

[Sean DALY]

hmmm I like "Activity Library" too... "Activities Library" even
better... but let's think twice before we drop "Sugar" from it.

"sugar+activities" is already well-referenced, but I would like to see
result Nr.1 be the aslo section page.

Our strategy is star marketing on the Activities (this why we always
capitalize), and linking them to Sugar mentioning the collaboration
and view source benefits. The idea being that Activities are not
applets to be run under OSes for grownups, but part of what comes with
the platform which itself runs on different systems.

Perhaps we can refer to "Sugar Activities Library" outside our site,
and "Activities Library" within it? Except for the aslo page which I
do think should be titled "Sugar Activities Library" for the
aforementioned SEO reason.

Sean


On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 4:09 PM, David Farning <dfarning at sugarlabs.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Gary C Martin <gary at garycmartin.com> wrote:
>> On 4 Apr 2009, at 03:25, Eben Eliason wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Frederick Grose <fgrose at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> To me, Portal is the weak word in Sugar Activities Portal.  Portal
>>>> doesn't
>>>> give the warm, learning, discovery place like the word Library.
>>>>
>>>> So I would propose Sugar Activities Library.  A place to check out
>>>> activities and discovery what is free to learn.
>>>
>>> +1!
>>> Maybe just "Activity Library" (non-plural, and dropping Sugar unless
>>> discussing it outside the Sugar context)?
>>
>> +1 Activity Library sounds good to me :-)
>>
> That has a great sound to it.
>
> david
>
> Although in Wisconsin schools have started calling libraries IMLCs or
> Instructional Media Learning Centers:)
> _______________________________________________
> Marketing mailing list
> Marketing at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing
>