[IAEP] squeak/etoys accepted as free software... (was Re: Sugar on Ubuntu - Summary
yoshiki at vpri.org
Fri Nov 7 19:42:33 EST 2008
At Sat, 8 Nov 2008 01:32:49 +0100,
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >Part of the honest worry about these issues comes from very good
> >reasons not to just trust everyone. But it also seems that e.g. Debian
> >needs to widen its circle of trust to include experts in wider
> >varieties of programming. There are plenty of trustworthy Smalltalkers
> >and Squeakers, and there is absolutely no reason that some should not
> >be on call to deal with perceived problems.
> If you mean that Debian ought to trust upstream to fix bugs and take
> care of security issues _instead_ of its own package maintainers, then I
> disagree: I believe *both* upstream and the distribution-specific
> routines should be applied in parallel.
I think he just means that Etoys is no different from others. Etoys
is just happened to be written in a different language and there are
people who understands or can learn the language; none of what you
wrote in this email suggests Etoys needs to be treated differently.
More information about the IAEP