[IAEP] Sugar on Ubuntu - Summary
David Van Assche
dvanassche at gmail.com
Fri Nov 7 08:12:02 EST 2008
I think the fact no source code is available might cause a problem for
it getting into Main... thats not necessarily such a bad thing though.
Edubuntu addon packages will definitely go to universe, its just a
question of when. The only difference is, no direct downstream
support. But as I understand it this support will come from mostly
upstream anyway, and there are a couple of ubuntu devs on upstream
anyway.
Or am I missing something, is there some reason we absolutely must
have Canonical support for squeak?
David
On 11/7/08, Holger Levsen <holger at layer-acht.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> additionaly to what Bert said:
>
> to summarize _my understanding_ again: there is source, there is just no ascii
> representation of the source / you cannot compile the source to binaries.
> Because the source comes as blobs (being the VM in it's state), which can be
> edited inside the virtual machine it represents.
>
> In theory squeak can be bootstrapped, in practice not.
>
> (Hence, there is a chicken and egg problem. (For non squeak developers. Squeak
> developers are used to this and happy about it.))
>
>
> regards,
>
> Holger
>
> _______________________________________________
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
>
More information about the IAEP
mailing list