[IAEP] Project hosting

[Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero]

Hello

On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Greg Dekoenigsberg <gdk at redhat.com> wrote:

>
> On Tue, 27 May 2008, David Farning wrote:
>
>  On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 15:32 -0400, Ivan Krstić wrote:
>>
>>> Why the seemingly purposeless duplication of infrastructure which
>>> outsiders are almost sure to find confusing? While OLPC's development lists
>>> (in particular sugar@) serve their purpose, no new lists are needed.
>>> While OLPC is providing adequate code hosting infrastructure, no new hosting
>>> infrastructure is needed, and so on. Let's please start offering
>>> sugarlabs.org code hosting when OLPC rejects a project and not before
>>> that. Until then, mirroring will suffice.
>>>
>>>  Without clear purposes and responsibilities, _both_ projects suffer.
>> From reading the archives of this mailing list and the wiki, I had come to
>> the conclusion that the purpose of Sugar Labs was to develop a software
>> stack that could be passed on to others for customization and distribution.
>>
>> On the other hand, OLPC is going to receive the Sugar stack from Sugar
>> Labs and customize it for their machines.  OPLC will be able focus on
>> developing new laptops and deploying them.
>>
>
> The critical question: does the OLPC organization agree with this
> assessment?
>
> Who is upstream for Sugar?
>
> --g



If OLPC agrees , i think there is no need for new infraestructure as
neurallis said.

sugarlabs could be as open as it desires, with  no need for new
infraestructure.




> _______________________________________________
> Its.an.education.project mailing list
> Its.an.education.project at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.lo-res.org/mailman/listinfo/its.an.education.project
>
>


-- 
Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
One Laptop Per Child
rafael at laptop.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lo-res.org/pipermail/its.an.education.project/attachments/20080527/feb07157/attachment.htm>