kevin.cole at gallaudet.edu
Mon May 19 23:57:16 CEST 2008
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Pamela Jones <pj2 at groklaw.net> wrote:
> That's not comparable. OLPC was always frank that it was a target price,
> depending upon volume. Had Intel/Microsoft not interfered with the volume,
> likely the target would have been reached and likely will at some point
> This is quoting a figure that is either true or not true at the time it is
> Don't let all the FUD about the XO join your permanent memory bank.
Ah. I never fear to show my ignorance in public. While I realized
that OLPC was talking about a target price, I had assumed (rather than
investigated) that the SD card business was a similar sort of
statement. My mistake. Sorry 'bout that, chief.
More information about the Its.an.education.project