[IAEP] Process for moving wiki pages -was status report june 4

[Samuel Klein]

 Good plan.

A transwiki project page on the olpcwiki would be a good idea as well.
Wikis tend to approve when you start a project within them to move material
off, so that discussions such as this one have a history and talkpage within
the wiki.

See [[olpc:OLPC:Transwiki#SugarLabs]]
I recommend moving [any procedural bits of] this thread there.

SJ


On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:02 PM, David Farning <dfarning at gmail.com> wrote:

> Plan to move pages sugar related pages from w.l.o to w.s.o
> version 0.2
>
>         * SugarModule
>         * SugarBaseModule
>         * SugarDatastoreModule
>         * SugarPresenceServiceModule
>         * SugarToolkitModule
>         * SugarArtworkModule
>
> /before loop/
> 1. Create 'move request' template at w.l.o.
> 2. Create 'moved to w.s.o' template at w.l.o.
> 2. Create 'imported from w.l.o' template at w.s.o.
>
> /loop/
> 1.  Go through the OLPC wiki page by page looking for material related
> to developing the 6 modules listed above.  (working with around 5 pages
> per batch)
> 2.  Add a 'request to move template' to original pages at w.l.o.
> 3.  Export page/history/talk/... from w.l.o this will leave
> original contents at olpc.
> 5.  Import pages into correct place on wiki.sl hierarchy. Add 'moved
> from w.l.o' so editors at w.s.o can make appropriate changes.
> 6.  sleep several days
> 7.  restart loop
> /end loop/
>
>
> /for each loop/
> 1. After brief waiting period for comments on (1 week?) update links to
> original olpc pages with an interwiki link to new location at Sugar
> Labs.
> 2.  Add full-page 'contents moved to sister site' template to original
> page at w.l.o.  Similar to template for Help: pages.
>
>
> At this point, the pages which have been moved to w.s.o will be
> templated 'moved from' , the original pages at w.l.o will be templated
> 'moved to' with soft redirect to w.s.o page.
>
> pages at w.s.o will be flagged for editing to sugar viewpoint.
> pages at w.l.o will be flageed for editing to OLPC viewpoint. to
>
> For example, for most of the pages in the above modules, the olpc page
> should include a short description and a link to details; at worst a
> number of specific subpages can be merged into a higher-level page, but
> each module will likely still want a couple pages @ olpc.
>
> Dfarning
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lo-res.org/pipermail/its.an.education.project/attachments/20080604/5875d3e4/attachment.htm>