[IAEP] Sugar Lab Meeting

[Marco Pesenti Gritti]

On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Simon Schampijer <simon at schampijer.de> wrote:
> David Farning wrote:
>>
>> This week Simon opined on the status of Sugar meetings.
>> 
>>>
>>> I think that our dev meetings have not been accepted as much as i have
>>> hoped they would have been. With accepted I mean for example that people
>>> don't
>>> suggest topics themselves. Maybe this was not the right approach and we
>>> have to set
>>> the topics our self (at least for now).
>>
>> It would be good to get Mako's input on this.  If my memory does not
>> fail me, he ran some effective meetings at Ubuntu.
>>
>>> I just wonder what I really expect from the meetings. (points don't
>>> have to be exclusive)
>>>
>>> a) an update what happened this week, who is working on what (in
>>> development, process change)
>>> b) discussion of new features
>>> c) bug triage - give out little tasks to people(opportunity/sugar
>>> love)
>>> d) introduce new people
>>> e) people ask questions - like activity developers
>>> f) maybe this is not developers only and we start to discuss education
>>> topics, deployments as well
>>
>> It seems time to split the sugar meeting into developers and Sugar Labs.
>> Would this be a good time to start booting up the Oversight board?
>>
>> Maybe a Weekly Sugar Labs meeting with the Oversight board taking part
>> once per month.
>>
>> dfarning
>
> Actually, for me the meeting was always a developers one. With creating a
> regular meeting for sugarlabs we make this distinction clearer and we can
> focus better in both meetings. Sounds like a good plan to me.

Sounds good to me as well.

Marco