<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/9/5 Walter Bender <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:walter.bender@gmail.com">walter.bender@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
CCing our treasurer.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Jameson Quinn<<a href="mailto:jameson.quinn@gmail.com">jameson.quinn@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> A)<br>
><br>
> Mentors, you may have caught the traffic on the GSoC mentor's list about the<br>
> mentor's summit on October 24th and 25th (+ some on the evening of the<br>
> 23rd). Google is paying for 2 slots from each organization, but in all<br>
> probability has room at the summit for more. As far as I can tell from<br>
> asking on IRC, the people interested in going are Andres, Bryan, and myself.<br>
> Roughly, the tickets for Andres and Bryan put together should cost the $2000<br>
> that Google is fronting for travel. My ticket, including bus fare to Mexico<br>
> City, should be just under $500. The options for paying that:<br>
><br>
> 1. I pay myself - I would probably not be able to, so wouldn't come<br>
> 2. Bryan and Andres each give me 20% of their travel subsidy, so that we all<br>
> end up with 80% subsidy and paying 20% (ie, figure out how to make the<br>
> percentages even). This is better from my perspective and worse from theirs.<br>
> 3. Sugar Labs uses part of the $2500 it made from GSoC to fund my travel.<br>
> This would of course be nice from our perspective. Walter, does it look<br>
> feasible from Sugar Lab's?<br>
<br>
</div>#1 is unacceptable. Re #3, I don't know if that money is fungible, in<br>
that I thought it was designated to go to the mentors, in which case,<br>
there is little difference between #2 and #3 except the "pain" is<br>
spread a bit further--to all five of us. But personally, I support<br>
that option. Maybe we can ask each mentor to volunteer 20% of their<br>
honorarium?<br></blockquote><div><br>Oh, you consider it an honorarium for the mentor? Google considers it a subsidy for the organization, to use however the organization chooses, and most orgs do not just hand it over to the mentor in cash. Certainly, I would have no objection to getting $500 in cash, but that was not my expectation. I suppose we have to answer this question before we choose between #2 and #3. (Bryan already expressed some openness to #2, by the way.)<br>
</div></div><br>