Hi all. As per the latest development, public keys have been added to the XO-1 firmware. <a href="https://desarrollo.ceibal.edu.uy/issues/1671#note-66">https://desarrollo.ceibal.edu.uy/issues/1671#note-66</a> <a href="https://desarrollo.ceibal.edu.uy/issues/1671#note-67">https://desarrollo.ceibal.edu.uy/issues/1671#note-67</a> Now, as per <a href="https://desarrollo.ceibal.edu.uy/issues/1671#note-68">https://desarrollo.ceibal.edu.uy/issues/1671#note-68</a>, we need to install the developer-key, plus enable-security with the XO serial-number. So, a) Is there a way I can get a developer-key? b) How can I figure out the serial-number for my XO-1? Thanks and Regards, Ajay <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Anish Mangal <<a href="mailto:anish@activitycentral.com" target="_blank">anish@activitycentral.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 <div class="im"> On Mon 07 May 2012 07:04:12 PM IST, Ajay Garg wrote: > Update :: > > Esteban says, > > a) > On unlocked systems, the mesh-icons are not shown (EXPECTED BEHAVIOUR). > > b) > On locked systems, the mesh-icons are shown (UNEXPECTED BEHAVIOUR. The > effect should be same, irrespective of the lockedness of the image). > > > So, is there a way, so that the image may be locked/unlocked on an > adhoc basis, that may aid easy debugging? > > > Regards, > Ajay > > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Ajay Garg <<a href="mailto:ajay@activitycentral.com">ajay@activitycentral.com</a> </div><div class="im">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:ajay@activitycentral.com">ajay@activitycentral.com</a>>> wrote: > > Hi all. > > The ticket reference is > <a href="https://desarrollo.ceibal.edu.uy/issues/1671" target="_blank">https://desarrollo.ceibal.edu.uy/issues/1671</a> > > Herein, Esteban says that no mesh-icons are shown, if the security > is disabled. However, if security is enabled, the mesh-icons are > shown. > > Anyone any ideas, what security he may be talking about; and why > is it necessary? > > > Thanks and Regards, > Ajay > > > > </div><div class="im">> _______________________________________________ > Dextrose mailing list > <a href="mailto:Dextrose@lists.sugarlabs.org">Dextrose@lists.sugarlabs.org</a> > <a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/dextrose" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/dextrose</a> </div>FYI: <a href="http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Bitfrost" target="_blank">http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Bitfrost</a> There are two types of images: * Signed * Unsigned and similarly laptops are: * Locked (with a valid lease.sig) * Unlocked On locked laptops, only signed images may be flashed (by pressing the 4 gamepad keys while boot) On unlocked laptops, both types of images may be uploaded. It is not easy to 'toggle' signed/unsigned images. It is easy to toggle the locked/unlocked nature: * Make sure that the laptop is not permanently unlocked, following which * You'll need the develop.sig in the /security folder (to have the laptop unlocked) So please clear whether its a problem with locked/unlocked laptops or signed/unsigned images, both of which are quite strange behaviors. - -- Anish -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - <a href="http://enigmail.mozdev.org/" target="_blank">http://enigmail.mozdev.org/</a> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPp9IqAAoJEBoxUdDHDZVpKnQH/jGl2IH7HL/zClHNz4OC38Al nR5QBVjD7ufxrNdxq3tcBsus5Gg2dVxWa8uXNL3oBb+hlBAc8J1k2K4YPgChp0Pu IFV+m/tEaOjAwkG9A36Mq7lGB+jcmnR4WuJnly3SU8/RDr0L86JJcp08nq2gSNQ5 rPie7RO6IgMMT/0vmjMdGt4yHkKZbuRhr/CrOAVbaYUM3LYihS8Qq5mM48iZZ5OV sFTeeQQtIreurE1q91kqdMdXSqqH+r2T6L6Nu1jiRqEyRri0vAlANS7BAGQCojjK enf9RBjIdIcuPMoM/aRhUH7/7wnOQ87kltVhaNj2YVezmCj6OkfTQRQrto8wFhU= =auC5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- </blockquote></div>