[Dextrose] Query regarding a UY ticket

[Ajay Garg]

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Ajay Garg <ajay at activitycentral.com> wrote:

> Hi all.
>
> As per the latest development, public keys have been added to the XO-1
> firmware.
> https://desarrollo.ceibal.edu.uy/issues/1671#note-66
> https://desarrollo.ceibal.edu.uy/issues/1671#note-67
>
> Now, as per https://desarrollo.ceibal.edu.uy/issues/1671#note-68, we need
> to install the developer-key, plus enable-security with the XO
> serial-number.
>
> So,
>
> a)
> Is there a way I can get a developer-key?
>

Well, this part done, by following the instructions at
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activation_and_developer_keys#Getting_a_developer_key_for_your_running_XO_laptop






>
> b)
> How can I figure out the serial-number for my XO-1?
>
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Ajay
>
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Anish Mangal <anish at activitycentral.com>wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Mon 07 May 2012 07:04:12 PM IST, Ajay Garg wrote:
>> > Update ::
>> >
>> > Esteban says,
>> >
>> > a)
>> > On unlocked systems, the mesh-icons are not shown (EXPECTED BEHAVIOUR).
>> >
>> > b)
>> > On locked systems, the mesh-icons are shown (UNEXPECTED BEHAVIOUR. The
>> > effect should be same, irrespective of the lockedness of the image).
>> >
>> >
>> > So, is there a way, so that the image may be locked/unlocked on an
>> > adhoc basis, that may aid easy debugging?
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Ajay
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Ajay Garg <ajay at activitycentral.com
>> > <mailto:ajay at activitycentral.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     Hi all.
>> >
>> >     The ticket reference is
>> >     https://desarrollo.ceibal.edu.uy/issues/1671
>> >
>> >     Herein, Esteban says that no mesh-icons are shown, if the security
>> >     is disabled. However, if security is enabled, the mesh-icons are
>> >     shown.
>> >
>> >     Anyone any ideas, what security he may be talking about; and why
>> >     is it necessary?
>> >
>> >
>> >     Thanks and Regards,
>> >     Ajay
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Dextrose mailing list
>> > Dextrose at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/dextrose
>>
>> FYI: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Bitfrost
>>
>> There are two types of images:
>> * Signed
>> * Unsigned
>>
>> and similarly laptops are:
>> * Locked (with a valid lease.sig)
>> * Unlocked
>>
>> On locked laptops, only signed images may be flashed (by pressing the 4
>> gamepad keys while boot)
>>
>> On unlocked laptops, both types of images may be uploaded.
>>
>> It is not easy to 'toggle' signed/unsigned images.
>>
>> It is easy to toggle the locked/unlocked nature:
>> * Make sure that the laptop is not permanently unlocked, following which
>> * You'll need the develop.sig in the /security folder (to have the
>> laptop unlocked)
>>
>> So please clear whether its a problem with locked/unlocked laptops or
>> signed/unsigned images, both of which are quite strange behaviors.
>>
>> - --
>> Anish
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>>
>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPp9IqAAoJEBoxUdDHDZVpKnQH/jGl2IH7HL/zClHNz4OC38Al
>> nR5QBVjD7ufxrNdxq3tcBsus5Gg2dVxWa8uXNL3oBb+hlBAc8J1k2K4YPgChp0Pu
>> IFV+m/tEaOjAwkG9A36Mq7lGB+jcmnR4WuJnly3SU8/RDr0L86JJcp08nq2gSNQ5
>> rPie7RO6IgMMT/0vmjMdGt4yHkKZbuRhr/CrOAVbaYUM3LYihS8Qq5mM48iZZ5OV
>> sFTeeQQtIreurE1q91kqdMdXSqqH+r2T6L6Nu1jiRqEyRri0vAlANS7BAGQCojjK
>> enf9RBjIdIcuPMoM/aRhUH7/7wnOQ87kltVhaNj2YVezmCj6OkfTQRQrto8wFhU=
>> =auC5
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/dextrose/attachments/20120509/df3a8714/attachment.html>