jerry at laptop.org.au
Tue Jan 24 17:48:41 EST 2012
On 24 January 2012 15:15, Sascha Silbe <silbe at activitycentral.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Jerry Vonau's message of 2012-01-24 20:07:17 +0100:
> > I'm a little confused, when I view:
> > the url path points to:
> > http://people.sugarlabs.org/silbe/dextrose/patchsets/ where
> > sugar-dx3-20111216.tar.gz should be but is not.
> 20111216 is special in that Anish prepared the patch set, instead of me.
> It seems he forgot to adjust the tarball URL in the spec when rolling
> the new package. But the exact tarball that was used is in the source
> rpm (that you already found), no matter whether the URL in the spec file
> is valid.
> Todays patch set  will contain the relevant patches from 20111216 on
> top of those I added since sugar-dx3-20111213. I'm currently
> coordinating with Anish to get new rpms and a new build out ASAP (he's
> travelling right now).
> > I'm a bit confused with
> > the process to re-create the latest dextrose rpms that would have proxy
> > support for yum that is in sugar-dx3-20111216.
> To recreate a binary rpm, you can always just use the source rpm as we
> do exactly the same (sources -> source rpm -> binary rpm).
patch 0064 from patchset-20111216 is the one that should be used, that one
creates the file that would be sourced by yum once you "echo
"include=/tmp/yum.conf.mod" >> /etc/yum.conf" somewhere in OOB. The OOB
implementation used in dx3g091.zd is incorrect. and results in sl#3284.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Dextrose