[Bugs] #328 UNSP: no feedback when you Start a journal entry that no activity can open
Sugar Labs Bugs
bugtracker-noreply at sugarlabs.org
Fri Oct 15 09:10:46 EDT 2010
#328: no feedback when you Start a journal entry that no activity can open
------------------------------------------+---------------------------------
Reporter: skierpage | Owner: tomeu
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: Unspecified by Maintainer | Milestone: 0.88.x
Component: journal | Version: 0.82.x
Severity: Minor | Keywords: r?
Status_field: Assigned | Distribution:
Seeta_dev: Mukul |
------------------------------------------+---------------------------------
Changes (by FGrose):
* distribution: OLPC =>
Comment:
For an uninstantiated Journal entry in Sugar 0.88.1, the 'Start with' menu
item reveals an inactive, side sub-palette with the words 'No activity to
start entry' in gray.
Should we not try to keep the wording consistent for this similar
condition?
Adding 'installed' to the terse wording may help the Learner understand,
but
it is still quite technical for the general audience. Would it be better
to
use more general wording, such as, "No activity is available to start the
entry."
Since it is a side sub-palette, the additional length should not be a
hindrance, and any additional clarity would better match Sugar's goals.
In messages like this, a grammatically complete sentence (also ending with
a
period) is also very helpful and instructive for Learners.
In summary, if this reasoning is accepted, the sub-palette message should
be
changed in at least 2 places.
Mailing list discussion in these threads:
http://www.mail-archive.com/sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org/msg17357.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org/msg17115.html
--
Ticket URL: <http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/328#comment:7>
Sugar Labs <http://sugarlabs.org/>
Sugar Labs bug tracking system
More information about the Bugs
mailing list