[Bugs] #2087 UNSP: [Enhancement] Protected Activities
Sugar Labs Bugs
bugtracker-noreply at sugarlabs.org
Wed Jul 14 09:32:35 EDT 2010
#2087: [Enhancement] Protected Activities
------------------------------------------+---------------------------------
Reporter: tch | Owner: tch
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: Unspecified by Maintainer | Milestone: Unspecified by Release Team
Component: sugar | Version: Unspecified
Severity: Unspecified | Keywords: sugar-love r!
Distribution: Unspecified | Status_field: Unconfirmed
------------------------------------------+---------------------------------
Comment(by tch):
Replying to [comment:5 tomeu]:
> Three questions:
>
> - have you considered using GConf so deployments can change the default
without patching rpms? May be good to avoid one more configuration file.
>
I see, I did use gconf in the first patch version, just though it would be
confusing to have some activities list configurations in text files and
others in gconf. Plus, I think I have seen some discussions about the
future of gconf. That's why I used a text file.
> - do we want to hide the menu option or to grey it out like we do when
we cannot write to the dir?
>
Honestly, I don't think it makes any difference. If theres some good
argument I don't know, please let me know and I'll change it.
> - don't we want two separate error messages when we fail to read either
the favorite defaults or the protected activities?
>
> s/protects_activity/is_activity_protected
>
Just did not like the idea of having 2 try blocks (one after another)
doing "almost" the same thing, but surely I can change that if you don't
agree. :)
--
Ticket URL: <http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2087#comment:6>
Sugar Labs <http://sugarlabs.org/>
Sugar Labs bug tracking system
More information about the Bugs
mailing list