[ASLO] [Sugar-devel] Problem with number of version

[Walter Bender]

Peru is slowing moving to 11.3 (Sugar 0.94) but there are many 0.84
machines in the field.

-walter

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
<alanjas at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> We should not be using dotted version numbers for activities intended to
>> be installed at deployments running builds older than Sugar 0.92.0.
>
> In Uruguay, one week ago, the latest image was Sugar 0.88 !
> Now (by luck) we have Sugar 0.94 :-)
>
> In others deployments, what Sugar version are their using?
>
> For example, have sense maintain in the code "back compatibility" with sugar
> < 0.86 ??
>
> Regards!
>
> Alan



-- 
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org