[ASLO] [REQUEST] Etoys-113

[Aleksey Lim]

On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 08:54:26PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> On 01.12.2009, at 20:42, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 12:34:35PM -0600, dfarning at sugarlabs.org wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
> >>> On 01.12.2009, at 18:52, Sugar Labs Activities wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>> A Sugar Labs Activities Editor requested further information from you regarding version 113 of your activity Etoys.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Aleksey Lim wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>> "This activity works with 0.82 as well but previous version was only 0.84.
> >>> 
> >>> I can't remember releasing the previous version for 0.84 only.
> >>> 
> >>> And wouldn't marking the new bundle as only for 0.86 give the impression it does not work in earlier releases?
> >>> 
> >>> OTOH since it is pre-installed anyway it doesn't really matter. If you think marking it for 0.86 only is better, feel free to do so.
> >>> 
> >>>>  And since its only startup wrapper maybe it makes sense to keep this activity per sugar release(to not confuse users when they see etoys "last" version in Home view)?"
> >>> 
> >>> Well I'm confused. Doesn't the updater respect the bundle's update_url? What does the updater have to do with a.sl.o?
> >> 
> >> As of .86 sugar ships with a aslo-updater.  The updater pings a.sl.o to see if any new versions of installed activities exist.
> > 
> > at the end it depends on what the right version of etoys+etoys-activity
> > (keeping in mind that sugar user can see only etoys-activity version)
> > e.g. 0.82 user can install(since v133 was marked 0.82-0.86) v133 and
> > will see Etoys-133 in Home view but etoys will be the same(from
> > sucrose-0.82).
> 
> Except neither 0.82 nor 0.84 pay attention to a.sl.o. Only 0.86 does - that's when the new updater was introduced, right?

but user can install activity manually from ASLO

-- 
Aleksey